I stumbled upon a fascinating paper on arXiv the other day. Anyone who works with lasers should be familiar with the concept of stimulated emission - the means by which photons excite electrons which, in turn, emit more photons (identical, in phase, energy and velocity, to the original photon). But could you elicit a similar effect with nuclear decay? Specifically, can you make α decay happen?To take a step back momentarily, as we all probably know, helium is the second most common element in the Universe. It's created in stars during hydrogen fusion and the CNO cycle and it's nucleus is so stable that radioactive heavy atoms decay by spitting out helium nuclei - α particles. To give you some idea of how common these are in the Universe, about 9% of cosmic rays are α particles (90% of the rest are protons, with 1% being electrons).
The result is a collection of helium atoms in an identical quantum state. So then, can atoms cause stimulated emission the way photons do? Judging by this paper, Barabanov certainly thinks so! The effect is described for polonium and astatine atoms (which are α emitters). If he's right, it means that an atom travelling through superfluid helium will back-emit an α particle at the same velocity the atom's travelling through the superfluid. In other words, the emitted α particle is at rest with respect to the superfluid. You can think or it a bit like kicking a crate off the back of a moving truck. Kick it with just enough force and it will quickly come to rest, with respect to the ground.
Barabanov's work appears quite speculative, but it certainly does seem to make sense - even if it seems an unusual concept. The one problem would be detecting these α particles. Sadly, Barabanov doesn't elaborate much on how he'd like to do this, stating that "To detect the effect significant efforts and additional ideas may be needed". I must say, I'd very much like to see if anyone can come up with said ideas...



Comments
I know that impurities in superfluid helium tend to aggregate together -- apparently it can be a problem in helium nanodroplet spectroscopy, where they need to remove any stray 3He to prevent bad results. Or it used to be, anyway. It's been a while since I read any up-to-date literature...
I know that bizarre chemical compounds like He22+ can exist as excimers. Whether they can exist at cryogenic temperatures though, I simply don't know...
And I don't believe superfluid helium contains free electrons. If I remember rightly, it's not a superconductor (though it does have infinite thermal conductivity).